The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on women with endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study on referral center population.

BACKGROUND: Patients with endometriosis are thought to have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and estimates suggest that 6.2% of them were infected with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study enrolling 284 women at the Polyclinic of Modena between January 2020 and April 2021. Patients were given specific questionnaires to investigate COVID-19 infection and any changes in gynecological symptoms. All patients were also administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Syndrome (HADS) Questionnaire to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was to assess the clinical impact and any worsening of gynecological symptoms after COVID-19 infection; the secondary outcome was to evaluate the clinical and psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain. RESULTS: A total of 170 women experienced COVID-19 infection, while 114 were consistently negative and asymptomatic for COVID-19. The two groups showed similar baseline. A total of 122 women with COVID-19 infection and 106 COVID-19 negative patients had already the vaccine administration with two doses of vaccine (72.20% vs. 93%, P=0.001). Among the 170 patients affected by COVID-19, 41 (24%) reported worsening gynecologic endometriosis symptoms, during the infection. According to our results, 196 of 284 reported changes in their gynecological health status during pandemic, and 84 reported symptomatic worsening (42.9%); 24% of patients with infection reported feeling slowed down vs. 15.8% of unaffected patients (P=0.065) and 44% of positive patients reported loss of interest in self-care vs. 31% of negative patients (P=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endometriosis seemed to have worsening gynecological and psychological clinical status during the pandemic.

Effects of osteopathic manipulative therapy on recurrent pelvic pain and dyspareunia in women after surgery for endometriosis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical removal of deep infiltrating endometriosis is frequently associated with improvement in symptoms. However, because of the complex pathogenesis of pain in endometriosis that includes central sensitization and myofascial dysfunction, symptoms can persist after surgery. The aim of the present observational study is to explore the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in reducing persistent pelvic pain and dyspareunia in a sample of symptomatic women surgically treated for endometriosis. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of 69 patients treated with OMT, for persistent myofascial pain, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and dyspareunia after surgical eradication of endometriosis. Surgical, clinical and osteopathic reports were retrospectively analyzed in a chart review. Osteopathic interventions included myofascial release, balanced ligamentous/membranous tension and indirect fluidic technique. RESULTS: During the study period 345 patients underwent surgery for symptomatic endometriosis. Among them, 97 patients (28.1%) complained of post-operative persistent CPP and dyspareunia and 69 patients underwent osteopathic treatment. OMT reports showed a significant improvement of the symptoms after the first OMT session. Particularly, lower scores of CPP (mean NRS 4±4.2 vs. 0.2±0.7, P value. CONCLUSIONS: OMT, breaking the cycle of pain and normalizing the musculoskeletal pelvic activity, could be a successful technique to treat persistent chronic pain in women surgically treated for endometriosis.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has gained widespread application in several surgical specialties. Previous studies on the feasibility and safety of RALS vs standard laparoscopy (S-LPS) for rectosigmoid endometriosis are limited and reported conflicting data. This study aims to compare S-LPS and RALS in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of perioperative surgical and clinical data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicentric, observational, prospective cohort study including 44 patients affected by rectosigmoid endometriosis referred to two tertiary referral centers for endometriosis from September 2018 to September 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients underwent S-LPS, and 22 underwent RALS. Our primary outcome was to compare operative time (from skin incision to suture) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included: operative room time (patient entry into operative room and patient out), estimated blood loss, laparotomic conversion rate, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and evaluation of endometriosis-related symptoms at 12-month follow up. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding preoperative and surgical data, except for higher rates of hysterectomies and bilateral uterosacral ligament removal procedures in the RALS group. Also after adjusting for these discrepancies, operative time was similar between S-LPS and RALS. Operative room time was statistically longer in the RALS group compared with that of S-LPS. No statistically significant difference was found concerning other study outcomes. Pain and bowel symptoms improved in both groups at 12-month follow up. CONCLUSIONS: If performed by expert teams, RALS provides similar perioperative outcomes compared with S-LPS in rectosigmoid endometriosis surgical treatment, except for longer operative room time.

Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center's experience on 215 patients.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE) is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition. Most of the times it is asymptomatic and due to the low accuracy of diagnostic tests, it is almost always detected during surgery for pelvic endometriosis. Its management is challenging and, until now, there are not guidelines about its treatment. METHODS: We describe a consecutive series of patients with DE managed by laparoscopy and videothoracoscopy (VATS) in our referral center in a period of 15 years. We developed a flow-chart classifying DE implants in foci, plaques and nodules and proposing an algorithm with the aim of standardizing the surgical approach. RESULTS: 215 patients were treated for DE. Lesions were almost always localized on the right hemidiaphragm (91%), and the endometriotic implants were distributed as: foci in 133 (62%), plaques in 24 (11%) and nodules in 58 patients (27%), respectively. In all cases of isolated pleural involvement, concomitant diaphragmatic hernia or lesions of the thoracic side of the diaphragm VATS was performed, alone or combined with laparoscopy, resulting in a total of 26 procedures. Following the proposed algorithm, specific surgical techniques were identified as the better approaches for the different types of the lesion, such as Argon Beam Coagulation and diathermocoagulation for diaphragmatic foci, peritoneal stripping for plaques, and nodulectomy or full-thickness resection of diaphragm for nodules. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to standardize the surgical approach of DE, according to the type of lesion, thus reducing the rate of under- or over-treatments and intra or postoperative complications. This kind of surgery should be performed in a Referral Center by a gynecologic surgeon with oncogynecologic expertise and skills, with the eventual support of a laparoscopic general surgeon, a specialized thoracic surgeon and a trained anesthesiologist.

Robot-Assisted Nerve-sparing Resection of Bilateral Parametrial Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the surgical steps used to perform a robotic radical parametrectomy in a woman with deep infiltrating endometriosis. DESIGN: Description of the procedure using video. SETTING: University hospital, referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A 47-year-old woman, with a body mass index of 31 kg/m2, who had undergone a supracervical hysterectomy for fibromatosis 5 years earlier, presented for definitive surgical management of parametrial and rectal endometriosis-associated pain. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing eradication of endometriosis, trachelectomy, and rectal shaving were planned. On the right side, the retroperitoneum was opened to widely expose the ureter, and a right adnexectomy was performed, gently separating the ureter from the diffuse periadnexal fibrosis. Right medial pararectal space was developed, and after right partial uterolysis, a nerve-sparing resection of the posterior parametrial endometriosis was performed. On the left side, endometriotic infiltration penetrated into the lateral and anterior (cranial portion) parametrium, wrapping the left uterine artery and the ureter. Left paravesical and pararectal spaces were developed. The left uterine artery was clipped at its origin, and the resection of the lateral and anterior parametrial nodules was completed following the shape of the nodule, dividing the lesion in 2 parts, and following the plane of the deep uterine vein to avoid excision of the nerve branches from the left inferior hypogastric plexus. Rectal endometriosis was removed by shaving, and the surgery ended with trachelectomy and robotic suture of the vaginal cuff. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopy is a safe and effective technique for nerve-sparing resection of parametrial endometriosis.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine systems as female contraceptives.

INTRODUCTION: The availability and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs), have increased in recent times. AREAS COVERED: The authors provide a narrative review of the LNG-IUSs currently available worldwide as female contraceptives (LNG-IUS 13.5, 19.5 and 52 mg). Specific features of the devices and their parameters of efficacy and tolerability were considered as outcomes. EXPERT OPINION: The one-handed 3.8-mm-diameter inserter of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg and 19.5 mg may be particularly suitable in nulliparous women. While LNG-IUSs 13.5, 19.5 mg and LNG 52 mg should be used by women simply looking for an effective contraceptive method for up to 3, 4 or 5 years, LNG-IUS 52 mg has also been approved for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial protection during hormone replacement therapy. LNG-IUS 52 mg is ideal for women who are experiencing a certain hyperestrogenic hormonal environment, with heavy menstrual bleeding due to hormonal imbalances, adenomyosis or fibroids, in the case of symptomatic endometriosis or for endometrial protection during hormone estrogenic replacement therapy in non-hysterectomized women.

Imaging features of uterine and ovarian fibromatosis in Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome.

Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome also known as Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder. It is characterized by basal cell carcinomas, odontogenic keratocysts, skeletal abnormalities and in a minority of female patients bilateral calcified ovarian fibromas. It is challenging to radiologically assess ovarian fibromas as they have similar imaging patterns to some malignant ovarian lesions. However, it is vitally important to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions to determine patients' suitability for fertility-sparing surgery. This report describes a case of a 25 year-old patient with Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome and bilateral ovarian fibromas.